[VOIPSEC] Put STUN in NAT Boxes?
Simon Horne
s.horne at packetizer.com
Mon Jun 25 08:02:01 CDT 2007
Dan (Wing)
I noticed that you submitted a proposal to add STUN to NAT devices
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wing-behave-nat-control-stun-usage-02.txt
and looking at sect 14.4 of the STUN working document
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-rfc3489bis-06#section-14.4
Your long term solution to NAT traversal is to control the NAT boxes? Are
you giving up on the initial idea of ICE which was to work with existing
NATs and instead taking the UPnP and MIDCOM type approach and putting some
form of control into the NAT boxes and attempt to control/instruct them?
Simon
More information about the Voipsec
mailing list