[VOIPSEC] VoIP providers must allow wiretapping bylaw enforcement agencies by next May 14

Hank Cohen hcohen at hifn.com
Tue Jun 13 17:51:24 CDT 2006


 I just finished touring the world talking with customers in Europe, the
Middle East and Asia about VoIP security and everyone agreed that
although CALEA is a US law every jurisdiction in the world has a legal
intercept requirement.  The US probably has better legal oversight than
many jurisdictions but any prudent VoIP service provider had better be
thinking very seriously about how to provide legal intercept no matter
where in the world they operate.

Hank Cohen
Hifn

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Voipsec-bounces at voipsa.org 
> [mailto:Voipsec-bounces at voipsa.org] On Behalf Of Voiceline
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 8:24 AM
> To: Lee Dilkie; brian.honan at bhconsulting.ie
> Cc: Voipsec at voipsa.org
> Subject: Re: [VOIPSEC] VoIP providers must allow wiretapping 
> bylaw enforcement agencies by next May 14
> 
> I am not sure if I have a point here - anyway here goes: As 
> fare as I know - 
> US law only applies to US based companies. Mighty is the 
> power of America, 
> but they don't have world domination - yet. So just move your 
> company to 
> another country, right? FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said; "Enabling law 
> enforcement to ensure our safety and security is of paramount 
> importance," - 
> is there a deferens between Safety and Security? - We all 
> know that this act 
> is not going to make the world any safer; it's just not that 
> simple. What we 
> do know is this: CDT Policy Director Jim Dempsey said "This 
> ruling threatens 
> both civil liberties and technology innovation," - and that 
> we know fore 
> sure...
> 
> 
> Regards/ Patrick
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Lee Dilkie" <lee_dilkie at mitel.com>
> To: <brian.honan at bhconsulting.ie>
> Cc: <Voipsec at voipsa.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 3:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOIPSEC] VoIP providers must allow wiretapping by law 
> enforcement agencies by next May 14
> 
> 
> >
> > Brian Honan wrote:
> >> Apologies, my maiden post and I forget to post the link - Doh !!
> >>
> >> 
> http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArt
> icleBasic&articleId=9001091&taxonomyId
> >> =17
> >>
> >>
> > ...
> >> Hi Folks
> >>
> >> I came across this article today and thought it would be 
> of interest to 
> >> everyone on the list,
> >> especially in light of the recent posting regarding Skype. 
>  How will ISPs 
> >> deal with providing access
> >> to Skype traffic in this scenario?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Brian
> >>
> > As I understand it, it's not the ISP's responsibility to 
> allow access
> > for wiretap, it's the responsibility of the "VoIP 
> provider". In which
> > case, it falls upon Skype, Vonage, MSN and cable VoIP providers to
> > implement the required functionality in whatever way they 
> see fit to 
> > comply.
> >
> > -lee
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Voipsec mailing list
> > Voipsec at voipsa.org
> > http://voipsa.org/mailman/listinfo/voipsec_voipsa.org 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Voipsec mailing list
> Voipsec at voipsa.org
> http://voipsa.org/mailman/listinfo/voipsec_voipsa.org
> 
> 





More information about the Voipsec mailing list