[VOIPSEC] SNMP support for EventCorrelation/NetworkManagementSystems
Robert Moskowitz
rgm at icsalabs.com
Fri Feb 25 14:21:40 CST 2005
At 03:02 PM 2/25/2005, Mark Teicher wrote:
>I agree SNMPV3 has the facilities to protect the content of the message,
>but most end point devices may not have enough capabilities to provide the
>extra over head to support SNMP v3.
They are then going to have it for IPsec?
Odds are they do. I will talk to the Spectrographics and Symbol gang that
attend the 802.11 meetings.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm at icsalabs.com>
>Sent: Feb 25, 2005 1:51 PM
>To: Chris at sip1.com, 'Mark Teicher' <mht3 at earthlink.net>, Voipsec at voipsa.org
>Subject: RE: [VOIPSEC] SNMP support
>for EventCorrelation/NetworkManagementSystems
>
>At 11:05 PM 2/23/2005, Christopher A. Martin wrote:
> >I suspect if they are going to implement SNMP the message is getting out
> >there...
> >
> >I would not even consider the alternatives unless there were SSL/TLS or SSH
> >support of some kind to protect the confidentiality of the traps and or
> >signaling as this can be valuable information to an attacker if it can be
> >gained.
>
>SNMPv3 has the facilities to protect the messages.
>
>Note since SNMP is NOT over TCP, you can't run it thorugh SSH (Oh how I
>would love to for other things. I was talking to TOmmi Lampila at SSH, and
>he said, nope no UDP still).
>
>Running UDP through SSL is kind of tricky. Some of the SSL VPNs do it.
>
>Actually, IPsec would make hte most sense.
>
>
>
>Robert Moskowitz
>Senior Technical Director
>ICSA Labs, a division of Cybertrust, Inc.
>W: 248-968-9809
>F: 248-968-2824
>E: rgm at icsalabs.com
>
>There's no limit to what can be accomplished
>if it doesn't matter who gets the credit
Robert Moskowitz
Senior Technical Director
ICSA Labs, a division of Cybertrust, Inc.
W: 248-968-9809
F: 248-968-2824
E: rgm at icsalabs.com
There's no limit to what can be accomplished
if it doesn't matter who gets the credit
More information about the Voipsec
mailing list